# Self-Check Rubric

Score every finished deck out of 100. Return the result in the final note.

## Dimensions

| Dimension | Points | What To Check |
|---|---:|---|
| Narrative spine | 20 | One core judgment, anti-common-sense opening, clear sections, strong ending |
| Visual structure | 20 | Each major point becomes a map, matrix, table, ladder, loop, quote card, or scorecard |
| Presentation mechanics | 20 | Chapter nav, slide controls, keyboard, fullscreen, responsive, print mode |
| Publish readiness | 20 | Self-contained HTML, no missing assets, no local-only links, deployable static structure |
| Voice fidelity | 20 | Direct public-account tone, practical examples, contrast language, no generic AI slogans |

## Level Mapping

- L5: 93-100  
  Can be published or taught from immediately. Style, structure, interaction, and QA are all strong.

- L4: 85-92  
  Strong delivery version. Minor wording, density, or mobile polish may remain.

- L3: 75-84  
  Usable first version. Must disclose the weakest dimension and the next fix.

- L2: 60-74  
  Draft. The deck may communicate the idea, but visual structure or interaction is not reliable enough.

- L1: below 60  
  Not deliverable. Rebuild the spine or shell before showing it as finished.

## Mandatory Fix Gates

Do not deliver as complete if any of these are true:

- No chapter navigation.
- No fullscreen or presentation mode.
- More than two consecutive slides are text-only.
- The deck copies 0531 visual styling instead of the public-account visual system.
- Mobile layout causes unreadable text or horizontal overflow.
- The core judgment is unclear after the cover and opening.

## Final Note Format

```markdown
自检等级：L4，88/100
叙事骨架 18/20，视觉结构 17/20，课件交互 18/20，发布就绪 18/20，风格贴合 17/20
最弱项：视觉结构，原因是第 3 章仍有一页偏文字化。
```

